Mod Archive Forums Mod Archive Forums
Advanced search  

News:

Please note: Your main modarchive.org account will not work here, you must create a forum account to post on the forums.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - stefix

Pages: [1]
1
MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker
« on: March 21, 2010, 23:55:45 »
Situation under control - I found a better notebook (PIII 500Mhz, 128 MB RAM, win98se OS). FT2 and Milky works without problem. Now I can connect it thru the mixer to another computer with Ableton etc.  to ennoble the signal using plugs for mastering.

I wonder why some modules are a bit too loud as can be seen on the peak level (in Milky).
Is this incompatibility issue between the trackers?

2
MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker
« on: March 19, 2010, 13:05:34 »
Thanks for your answers.

It's great idea to run real FastTracker II in DOS mode, I even haven't think about this simple solution  :) I just want to make some 4ch, oldschool chip-sounding tracks then I think FT2 (or IT) will be optimal way for me.


3
MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker
« on: March 19, 2010, 11:16:06 »
Thanks for replay.

I don't have this notebook yet. I asked becouse in my win XP x64 Milky Tracker process takes ~18MB of ram. 

4
MilkyTracker Support / Old notebook vs Milky Tracker
« on: March 19, 2010, 01:05:27 »
Hi all

I'm going to run Milky Tracker on  old notebook with pentium 166MHz Cpu and 16MB of RAM memory, windows 98 os. Is this possible ? Will Milky Tracker work fine on this "machine" ? ;D

Ps. Sorry for poor english   :P

Pages: [1]