I was just wondering what made my modules considered "not of sufficient quality." They were these 4:
* File: into_focus.xm
* MD5: 99349c7e95f5c89394d10daaf6010f4b
* Reason: The module was rejected because it was not of sufficient quality (on Wed 7th Jan 2009).
* File: a_moved_shot.xm
* MD5: d34c114f37e354fd6939d1621d97ad17
* Reason: The module was rejected because it was not of sufficient quality (on Wed 7th Jan 2009).
* File: breakbust.xm
* MD5: 11c7d5c1e6c41678130d66615fb8780f
* Reason: The module was rejected because it was not of sufficient quality (on Wed 7th Jan 2009).
* File: mellow_dish_march.xm
* MD5: ea3606c10362ced5633487a771b4280c
* Reason: The module was rejected because it was not of sufficient quality (on Wed 7th Jan 2009).
I just included the info so that it would help in finding them if need be, but can I reupload them with the artist tag on the front of the file name? If not, could you explain the reason behind the choice?
I was actually pretty proud of "A Moved Shot" and "Into Focus" (seeing as they lead into each other, those would be the most important ones to at least upload...PLEASE!). Those were the two songs that I actually wanted to get uploaded along with "Bebox Champion" and "Fuse Faction" (which got uploaded; but not these four?). I could understand Mellow Dish's ending as "low quality," but I thought that the other three were up to par...I guess not...
Not ragging on the screening process, just want to know why these were rejected...
EDIT: I really thought that Breakbust wold get in, too...oh well...