This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

1

MilkyTracker Support / Re: When I save my XM file to the MOD format, it changes the shape of my samples

« on: January 30, 2017, 17:38:22 »

Indeed, with milkytracker 26f975179392c115adc8b3b5cd594a20d63cd787 [1] (the latest git) I can't reproduce this bug.
But with milkytracker 0.90.86, I am still able to reproduce it.
Well, if you want to use a release but don't want to have this bug, I recommend to downgrade to milkytracker 0.90.85.
But if you want to use a current version, the 26f975179392c115adc8b3b5cd594a20d63cd787 version is fine.

[1] https://github.com/milkytracker/MilkyTracker/commit/26f975179392c115adc8b3b5cd594a20d63cd787

2

MilkyTracker News / Re: Website back up and running

« on: November 17, 2016, 05:58:40 »

Wow I am so happy to see this message.
I thought that the project was stopped because the last commit on GitHUB is from 2015-10-27 (more than one year!).

3

MilkyTracker Support / Re: When I save my XM file to the MOD format, it changes the shape of my samples

« on: October 08, 2016, 11:15:53 »

I found a workaround: Downgrading to MilkyTracker 0.90.85.
It is a bug in MilkyTracker version 0.90.86 that is not present in MilkyTracker version 0.90.85.
After building MilkyTracker version 0.90.85 on the same machine, I am not able to reproduce the bug.
It seems to be related to an already reported bug [1].
Unfortunately, the fix provided is not working.
I have built MilkyTracker version 0.90.86 with the provided patch [2] and it is not fixed: Saving my XM file to the MOD format changes the shape of my samples.

[1] https://modarchive.org/forums/index.php?topic=3494.0
[2] https://github.com/Deltafire/MilkyTracker/commit/2dca0cee34d49a34c4c162fdc076272622b569f7.patch

4

MilkyTracker Support / When I save my XM file to the MOD format, it changes the shape of my samples

« on: October 06, 2016, 14:49:56 »

Hello,

In MilkyTracker 0.90.86, when I save my XM file to the MOD format, it changes the shape of my samples.

In order to save my XM file to the MOD format, I do:
* Config > I/O > Frequency table > Amiga frequencies > OK
* Disk Op. > .mod > Save As

In the sample editor, at this moment, the shape of my samples is still good.
But if I load my .mod file on MilkyTracker, then I will see in the sample editor that the shape of my samples has changed.

Here are some screenshots to illustrate the problem:
* With a kick sample:

* With a sine sample:

* With a snare sample:

* With a square sample:


Can you explain me what I am doing wrong please?

Thank you.
Best regards.

5

MilkyTracker Feature Requests / Re: multiple input files

« on: March 09, 2014, 21:53:29 »

I do not think it is a problem but the correct behavior.
Indeed, if the user has the "Load module in new tab" setting disabled, I think it is normal to load each module in the same tab.
That is the expected behavior, isn't it?

6

MilkyTracker Feature Requests / Re: multiple input files

« on: February 25, 2014, 04:20:56 »

I have written a patch to enable this feature (attached to this message).
Can you add it for a future release please?

7

MilkyTracker Community / How to set the sample size to cover exactly 4 rows

« on: July 19, 2013, 11:59:26 »

Hello,

In the sample editor, I can chose the sample size.
If the sample size is low, the played note will cover a low number of rows (if it is very low, it can cover zero rows and only some ticks in the row).
If the sample size is big, the played note will cover a big number of rows (if it is very big, it can cover more than one pattern).

The problem is how to determine the sample size to cover exactly a number of rows (or ticks).

As example, I have BPM 125 and speed 6 (the default MilkyTracker values).
It means that I have 6 ticks per row.
I think the BPM and speed must be take in account to answer this question.

How to set the sample size to cover exactly 4 rows ?

Thank you.
Regards.

8

MilkyTracker Support / The same note, the same instrument at the same time on several channels

« on: October 30, 2012, 20:04:52 »

Hello,

I have just discovered a behavior in Milkytracker that I can't explained.
If I play the same note with the same instrument at the same time on several channels, the volume seems to be increased.
In theory, that's not possible, because the maximum volume value is 0x40 in the volume column.
So I am wondering what happened exactly when I put the same note with the same instrument at the same time on 2 channels. I can hear that the volume is increased.
Can I tell I have more than 0x40 and how much exactly ?
How the volume is distributed between each channel?

Thank you.
Regards.

9

MilkyTracker Community / Re: the MOD format and the instrument envelopes

« on: July 04, 2012, 19:21:28 »

In the manual, I read that the main difference between Cxx and Axy is that Cxx set the volume at a specified value whereas Axy slide up/down the volume at a specified speed.

I can do this :

Code: [Select]

C-5 .1 .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. A02
... .. .. A02
... .. .. A02
... .. .. A02
My speed is 5, so there are 5 ticks by row. Each tick, with the A02 effect, the volume is reduce of 2. So, in a row, I reduce the volume 5*2 = 10.
I try to do the same thing than with my previous Cxx effect. But after these rows, I can again hear the sound. It should be at 0 volume because I apply 4 times the A02 effect (40-(10*4) = 0). Probably I don't understand how to use exactly this effect.

Anyway, with the Axy effect I got the same problem than with the Cxx effect: I must add this effect each time I play a note.

Is it possible to avoid to add this effect each time I play a note without using instrument envelopes?

Thank you.

10

MilkyTracker Community / the MOD format and the instrument envelopes

« on: July 04, 2012, 12:11:49 »

Hello,

I use the old school MOD format (not the XM) for compatibility reasons.
I see a lot of features are disabled with this format (for example, the volume column can't be used).

Also, the instrument envelopes can't be used.
So, I use the Cxx effect to decrease the volume progressively.
Example :

Code: [Select]

C-5 .1 .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. ..
... .. .. C30
... .. .. C20
... .. .. C10
... .. .. C00But I must add this effect each time I play a note and maybe there is a better way to handle this.

Do you know a better way to decrease progressively the volume of a note without using instrument envelopes?

Thank you.