This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

1

MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker

« on: March 21, 2010, 23:55:45 »

Situation under control - I found a better notebook (PIII 500Mhz, 128 MB RAM, win98se OS). FT2 and Milky works without problem. Now I can connect it thru the mixer to another computer with Ableton etc.  to ennoble the signal using plugs for mastering.

I wonder why some modules are a bit too loud as can be seen on the peak level (in Milky).
Is this incompatibility issue between the trackers?

2

MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker

« on: March 19, 2010, 13:05:34 »

Thanks for your answers.

It's great idea to run real FastTracker II in DOS mode, I even haven't think about this simple solution  I just want to make some 4ch, oldschool chip-sounding tracks then I think FT2 (or IT) will be optimal way for me.

3

MilkyTracker Support / Re: Old notebook vs Milky Tracker

« on: March 19, 2010, 11:16:06 »

Thanks for replay.

I don't have this notebook yet. I asked becouse in my win XP x64 Milky Tracker process takes ~18MB of ram. 

4

MilkyTracker Support / Old notebook vs Milky Tracker

« on: March 19, 2010, 01:05:27 »

Hi all

I'm going to run Milky Tracker on  old notebook with pentium 166MHz Cpu and 16MB of RAM memory, windows 98 os. Is this possible ? Will Milky Tracker work fine on this "machine" ?

Ps. Sorry for poor english