and this one as well. https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=208909

Assigned to ID 93815

Granted. I've said this already in the discord, but I'll mention it here too for others. Please be attentive with what you upload. File renaming is experimental and I don't want to use it as much.

and this one as well. https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=208909

https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=196427
https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=196485

rename both of these to "chroma_ways-undeground_1" and "chroma_ways-indefinite", respectively
reason: they're from a game that primarily uses tracker mods for its music, and given that the rest of the game's music was uploaded on the site recently with a naming format like "chroma_ways-[song title]", it'd only make sense for the naming of those two tracks to be consistent with the naming of the rest of the soundtrack

https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=208838
https://modarchive.org/index.php?request=view_by_moduleid&query=208878

rename both of these to "dallas_-_cd-rw_sankari" and "dallas_-_superbajs_experience_2000", respectively
reason: song filenames don't match the song titles

Please provide 2024 Torrent again this year.

Clarification is appreciated, even if the question had gone a bit necrotic.

If you want to have your sample slices under one instrument, counting and changing their relative note accordingly is the way to go.

It's not only slow but also limiting because you can't then play the slices at arbitrary pitches from the start. Not every song needs this though, or repeating the same sample mapping for each octave could be enough.

Having each slice as its own instrument is faster to set up and doesn't have this limitation but you may prefer having the slices under one instrument number. It's a matter of personal preference and can depend on what's best for any given module.

There's also the option of keeping the loop intact as one sample and chopping it live with 9xx, which I prefer, but that also comes with its drawback of slower setup of trimming and resampling the loop to make the hits align with the 256-byte offsets of 9xx's granularity. Another limitation of this is that 9xx of course reserves the effect column for the triggering row.

Necro, but you're not setting channel volume as there is no such concept in .xm. You're setting instrument volume, overriding the default in the instrument settings.

Notes with instrument numbers always revert to the instrument defaults.

Notes without instrument numbers re-trigger the sample associated with the previously used instrument but don't reset instrument settings or envelopes.

 

Oh wait, I already fixed the problem. no need to worry anymore. sorry for the inconvenience
I forgot to put the address bruh